Existentialism and Humanistic Psychology Essay Example for Free

Existentialism and Humanistic Psychology EssayAngst, in the very spirit of its use in Existentialism, is a state of being that is not completely negative in itself as common people might think. In a more than positive sense, I believe angst is the extensive recognition of iodins wantondom. Angst is the result of ones realization that he is free and that secret code leave ever hold him back. It becomes negative because once a person gets a deeper understanding of how free he is, he tends to alarm that he might not be able to do things skillful and since nothing is holding him back, there is nothing to blame in case he fails. In short, angst is worship of the nothing (Park, 1999). It is different from normal fear which comes from the environment and has an heading and a possible solution. For example, I fear spiders so I squelch a air from dusty and old places. The object of the fear is spiders and the solution is to stay away from dusty and old places. In angst, the fear comes from within and there is basic every last(predicate)y neither object nor solution. There is solitary(prenominal) angst.And that is what makes angst a terrible state. I think it is very difficult to scent this way because it is like asking questions with no answers. And if ever I get into this terrible state, I think go out do one thing convince myself to believe that there is nothing to fear and that I shake off my family who will accept me no matter what. Meanwhile, the whole concept of Humanistic Psychology (the Ameri net variate of Existentialism, Ive read) interests me in a special way.The different theories of Rogers, Maslow, Csikszentmihalyi, among others that I learned from Chapter 13 gave me a measuring rod by step understanding into the inquiry of my existence. I cant conclude though that they all are right but certainly, they provide interesting thoughts worth pondering (especially Rogers 19 Propositions). The humanistic theories they turn in are differen t from the ones we learned in previous chapters because they focus on the experiences of the human person quite a than on things that are inherent or already existing such as biology, genes, or confidential motives.This means that since the theories of Humanists such as Rogers and Maslow focus on continuing experience of the person, they give a more positive approach knowing that these experiences that shape a person can vary depending on how he reacts to events. In a simpler way, while Bems theories seem to say Your mother has cancer so you will have cancer, too. Its in the blood humanists say Your mother has cancer. With the right attitude and lifestyle, you can hinder having cancer yourself. Humanists are a lot friendlier.I agree with these humanists, for the most part at least. I agree with the general thought of a persons experience shaping his personality. However, there is one thing I personally discord based on experience. Rogers said that this outcome fully functioning person could only occur for individuals who had received unconditional positive regard from the important people in their lives (Funder, 2007). I disagree with this because I know some people who, despite suffering from neglect from the people they love, still feel good about themselves and have great personalities.On the other hand, I give my nod to Maslow when he said higher needs such as self-actualization could come to the fore only after more basic needs related to survival and security became satisfied (Funder, 2007). I personally believe self-realization is a hierarchy and a continuing process. Thoughts on Punishment and Efficacy Theory Punishment is a useful technique of operant conditioning if it is applied correctly, which it almost neer is (Funder, 2007). I am especially caught by the last phrase of the quote it almost never is. I think punishment is something that is very tricky.It is difficult to use in the appropriate way but if you get it right, bingo It is very ef fective. Whats wrong with punishment is when one uses it in the wrong way. Self-Efficacy has always been my thing from the start, but I never realized it until I learned about it from our discussion. I have always been a positive psyche even amidst hard times. My working in Intel gives me new challenges every day and because of my belief that I can do all the demands of work, I accomplish them well. I live by the adage Believe in yourself because if you dont, nobody else will. With this, I get more confidence to push on higher.